Formation the Communicative Competence of the Future Sociologist as the Possibility of Raising Quality of Interviewing

Authors

  • Bakhtiyor Idrisov Melitopol State Pedagogical University named after Bogdan Khmelnytsky

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2306-3971-2016-01-58-63

Keywords:

professional competence, interviewing, communication competence

Abstract

Errors in the sociological forecasting often enough to overcome the problems associated with the unavailability of the respondents, and, accordingly, a lack of communicative competence of interviewers. So, for three years with students MDPU n. B. Khmelnytsky conducted a study in which identified actions of the teacher on formation at the future sociologists communicative component of professional practice and developed criteria for its evaluation. As a tool designed «Sociolinguistic method of determining the communicative competence» to optimize the training of interviewers on a specific topic of research. The study, conducted by the authors showed that the criteria for participation in the study must comply with the minimum level of «adequate, but need to further develop knowledge and skills in professional and everyday communication». The results of research show that the communicative competence of the future sociologists formed and developed in the course of vocational training and is acquired abilities, skills and potential of personal communicative potential in the working process and everyday communication. In the context of the requirements for the formation of future sociologists general professional competence of teachers of action should be aimed at the mastery of the communicative competence of the students, which reflects the level of Maturity of sociological thinking and relevant professional conceptual apparatus.

References

1. “The Bologna Process: midway” (2005), Ed. by V. Baydenko, Moscow : RNU, 379 p.
2. Idrisov, B. (2016), “Pedagogical possibilities of formation and development of communicative competence of future teachers”, Pedagogy and psychology the professional education, No. 1, Pp. 33–42.
3. Idrisov, B. (2012), “Electoral sociology: textbook”, Melitopol : MMD Publ. House, 256 p.
4. Homski, N. (1972), “Aspects of the theory of syntax”, Moscow : MSU, 233 p.
5. Deist, F., Winterton, J. (2005), What is competence?, Routledge Taylor&Francis Group : Human Resource Development International, Vol. 8, No. 1, Pp. 27–46.
6. Mueller, P. S., Keio, J. (2009), Incorporating professionalism into medical education: the Mayo Clinic experience, Medical Education, Vol. 58, No. 3, Pp. 133–143.
7. Social competence refers to personal, interpersonal and intercultural competence (2006), Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:c11090
8. Hymes, D. Pride, J. B., Holmes, J. (1972), On Communicative Competence, New-York: Harmondsworth: Penguin, Рp. 269–293.

Published

24.05.2018

Issue

Section

SOCIAL REALITY IN EMPIRICAL STUDIES