Ambivalent Nature of Political Markets: Does It Undermine a Democracy?
Keywords:
political process, political marketing, political market, democracyAbstract
This article is an attempt to analyze the contradictions of political marketing as a theory and technology. Various aspects of scholarly debate analyzed and various problems associated with application of political marketing are highlighted.
References
1. Shedler, A. (1997), The End of Politics? Explorations into Modern Antipolitics, London ; NY : Macmillan and St. Martin’s Press.
2. Diamond, L., Plattner, M. F. (2001), The Global Divergence of Democracies, Baltimore : Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
3. Newman, B. (1999), The Mass Marketing of Politics: Democracy in an Age of Manufactured Images, Thousand Oaks, CA.
4. Habermas, J. (1989), The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, Cambridge-Massachusetts : The MIT Press.
5. Arato, A., “The concept of civil society: climbing, decay and recreation”, Polis, No. 3, Pp. 48-57.
6. Kertzer, D. (1996), Politics and Symbol, Yale Univ. Press.
7. Marcuse, H.(1992), One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society, Boston : Beacon Press, 257 p.
8. Mills, C. (1956), White collar: The American middle classes, NY : Oxford Univ. Press.
9. Mills, C. (1970), The power elite, NY : Oxford Univ. Press.
10. Bellah, R., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. (1985), Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life, Los Angeles : Univ. of California Press, 355 p.
11. Tocqueville, A. (1969), Democracy in America. Garden City, NY : Anchor Books.
12. Veblen, T. (1965), The theory of the leisure class, NY : A. M. Kelley, 368 p.
13. Bourdieu, P. (1984), Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste, Cambridge, MA : Harvard Univ. Press, 607 p.
14. Schor, J. (1998), The overspent American: The unexpected decline of leisure, NY : Basic Books.
15. Taylor, B. (2000), The personal level. Do Americans shop too much?, Boston : Beacon Press.
16. Habermas, J. (1984), The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Cambridge : Polity, 430 p.
17. Bourdieu, P. (1993), The Field of Cultural Production, NY : Columbia Univ. Press.
18. Maksymov, A. A. (1999), Clean "and" dirty "election technologies, Moscow : Delo, 448 p.
2. Diamond, L., Plattner, M. F. (2001), The Global Divergence of Democracies, Baltimore : Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
3. Newman, B. (1999), The Mass Marketing of Politics: Democracy in an Age of Manufactured Images, Thousand Oaks, CA.
4. Habermas, J. (1989), The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, Cambridge-Massachusetts : The MIT Press.
5. Arato, A., “The concept of civil society: climbing, decay and recreation”, Polis, No. 3, Pp. 48-57.
6. Kertzer, D. (1996), Politics and Symbol, Yale Univ. Press.
7. Marcuse, H.(1992), One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society, Boston : Beacon Press, 257 p.
8. Mills, C. (1956), White collar: The American middle classes, NY : Oxford Univ. Press.
9. Mills, C. (1970), The power elite, NY : Oxford Univ. Press.
10. Bellah, R., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. (1985), Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life, Los Angeles : Univ. of California Press, 355 p.
11. Tocqueville, A. (1969), Democracy in America. Garden City, NY : Anchor Books.
12. Veblen, T. (1965), The theory of the leisure class, NY : A. M. Kelley, 368 p.
13. Bourdieu, P. (1984), Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste, Cambridge, MA : Harvard Univ. Press, 607 p.
14. Schor, J. (1998), The overspent American: The unexpected decline of leisure, NY : Basic Books.
15. Taylor, B. (2000), The personal level. Do Americans shop too much?, Boston : Beacon Press.
16. Habermas, J. (1984), The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Cambridge : Polity, 430 p.
17. Bourdieu, P. (1993), The Field of Cultural Production, NY : Columbia Univ. Press.
18. Maksymov, A. A. (1999), Clean "and" dirty "election technologies, Moscow : Delo, 448 p.
Downloads
Published
22.03.2018
Issue
Section
Methodology of social researches
