Strategies of Post-soviet Transformation of Belarus and Ukraine in the Mirror of Public Opinion

Authors

  • L. G. Titarenko Belarusian State University

Keywords:

Geopolitical strategy, Ukraine, Belarus, public opinion, borderland, transformation

Abstract

The article describes how the geopolitical situation of Ukraine and Belarus between the two big powers,
European Union and Russian Federation, opens new chances for integration as well as creats several problems. Their dual strategic belonging to East and West caused contradictory political strategies in both countries. The article analyses how the borderland situation of Ukraine and Belarus was reflected in public opinion polls in post-soviet period and which strategies dominate in both countries.

References

1. Belarus and Russia: Organizational and Legal Foundations of Integration 1996-2001, Minsk : Polymy, 333p.
2. Naumenko, L. I. (2012), Belarusian Identity. Content. Dynamics. Socio-Demographic and Regional Specificity, Minsk: Belarusian Science, 205 p.
3. Holovakha, Ye., Gorbachyk, A., (2010), Trends in social change in Ukraine and Europe: according to the results of the "European Social Research" 2005-2007-2009, Kyiv : Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 118 p.
4. Kotliarov, I. V., Verush, A. I. (2010), State Administration and Political Leadership: Socio-Political Analysis, Minsk: Belarusian Science, 278 p.
5. Zlobina, E., Reznik, A. (2006), Civic space of Ukraine: degree of identification and factors of consolidation, Sociology: theory, methods, marketing, No. 2, Pp. 177–194.
6. Integration barometer EDB 2012, St. Petersburg : Integration Research Center, 80 p.
7. Kutsenko, O. D. (2007), Ukraine in Transformation Processes. QuoVadis?, Sociology, No. 1, Pp. 18–32.
8. Lastovski, A. (2010), Russiantsentrizm as an ideological project of the Belarusian identity, Political sphere, No. 14, Pp. 18–32.
9. Manaev, O. T. (2011), “The formation of civil society in independent Belarus. Sociological experiments: 2006-2010. The third book”, St.Petersburg : Nevsky open space, 672 p.
10. IISEPS, www.iiseps.org
11. Panina, N. V. (2005), Factors of national identity, tolerance, xenophobia and anti-Semitism in modern Ukraine, Sociology: theory, methods, marketing, No. 4, Pp. 26–45.
12. Zlobina, O. H., Bevzenko, L. D., Martyniuk, I. O. and other (2011), Social interests in the context of socio-cultural modernization, Kyiv : NAS of Ukraine, Institute of Sociology, 319 p.
13. Tamash, P. (2011), “In the current situation, the elites of the EU will definitely speak for Russia, not Ukraine”, http://fraza.ua/stenograms/14.01.2011/107595.html
14. Ukrainian society. Twenty years of independence. Sociological monitoring (2011), Vol. 1: Analytical materials, ed. by Vorona, V. M., Shulga, M. O., Kyiv : Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 576 p.
15. Ukrainian society. Twenty years of independence. Sociological monitoring (2011), Vol. 2: Tables and graphs, ed. by Vorona, V. M., Shulga, M. O., Kyiv : Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 480 p.
16. Ulakhovych, V. (2009), “Formation of the foundations of foreign policy of the Republic of Belarus, 1995-2000”, Minsk : Harvest, 189 p.
17. Shulga, N. A. (2011), “Drawing on the edge: twenty years of social change in Ukraine”, Kyiv : Biznespoligraf, 448 p.
18. Rotman, D., Veremeeva, N. (2011), Belarus in the Context of the Neighbourhood Policy: Between the EU and Russia, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, No. 1, Vol. 27, Pp. 73–98.
19. Savelyev, Y., European integration and trends of development of Eastern European borderland, NaUKMA Non-academic Notes: Sociological Sciences, Vol. 122, Pp. 71–79.
20. Titarenko, L. (2009), Contemporary Belarus: Models of the National Identity and Basic Values of the Population, Sociology, History, Theory and Practices, Vol. 10, Pp. 270–291.
21. White, S., Korostelea, E., Lowenhardt, J. (2005), Postcommunist Belarus, MD : Rowman& Littlefield, 192 p.

Downloads

Published

04.05.2018

Issue

Section

SOCIAL REALITY IN EMPIRICAL STUDIES