Area of Meanings in the Dynamics of Society Development in the Context of Semiotic Reality Culture


  • Viktor Grushko Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk national pedagogical university



socio-cultural meanings, semiotic reality, bifurcation point, societal system, hierarchy of meanings


Every society is periodically undergoing ideological breaks when the old meanings lose their appeal to the majority, resulting it erodes the appointed social ties and decays social institutions. Ukrainian society is undergoing such difficult period nowadays, when it loses heart the ideals and values of the Soviet era and painfully looking for a new meaning in the post-colonial reality. Reasonable key role in the senses filled with the lives of individuals and human communities to certain content and their impact on the determination of their tactical and strategic goals in life, combined with the methods for achieving them. The mechanism senses influence on the formation of complex societies to build societal systems, the dynamics of the formation and destruction of human civilizations. The analysis of interaction between the different meanings that can engage each other in various qualities relationship of conflict to symbiotic, from attempts to take only a single well-defined niche in society attempts to cover almost all aspects of society, from constructing an ordered hierarchy of relations between the state of the lack of a unified system of priorities. The role of ideological and semantic crises that accompanied the collapse of the social system in which people comprehend in a new reality, form new meanings that are able to combine them for future joint actions and achieve new and important goals.


1. Batsevych, F. (2009), «Spiritual synergy of native language: linguophical essays», Kyiv : Publ. Centre «Akademia», 192 p.
2. Voznyak, T. (2009), «The phenomenon of city», Lviv: Independent cultural journal «JI», 333 p.
3. Grushko, V. (2014), «Ciies in cultural and semiotic shaping geopolitical spaces and zones of increased geopolitical tension», Ternopil: Proceedings V. Hnatiuka TNPU (geography), No 37, Vol. 2, C. 61–69.
4. Donchenko, O., Romanenko, Ju. (2001), «Archetypes of social life and politics», Kyiv : Lybid’, 334 p.
5. Kammings, S. (2010), «ReCreating Strategy», Kharkiv : Publ. Humanitarian Center, 560 p.
6. Katasonov, V. Ju. (2013), «Capitalism. History and ideology of monetary civilization», Moscow : Russian Civilization Institute, 1072 p.
7. Leary, T., Stuart, M. (2002), «Technology changes in consciousness», St. Petersburg: «Ekslibris», 224 p.
8. Lotman, Yu. M. (2004), «The semiosphere», St. Petersburg: «Art-St. Petersburg», 704 p.
9. Оpeyda, L. (2015), The Life-meaning Inquiries of the Modern Ukrainian, Socìologìčnì studìï, No. 2, Vol. 7, Pp. 23–27.
10. Ortega y Gasset, J. (2003), «The Revolt of the Masses», Moscow : OOO «Publishers AST», 509 p.
11. Sorokin, P. (1992), «Person. Civilization. Society», Moscow : Politizdat, 543 p.
12. Toynbee, A.J. (1991), «A study of history», Moscow : Progress, 736 p.
13. Frankl, V. (2016), «Man's Search for Meaning», Kharkiv : Knyjkoviy klub «Klub Simeynoho dozvilya», 160 p.