Conceptualization of Adaptation Models of Contemporary Immigrants from Ukraine in Israel

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2306-3971-2024-01-34-34

Keywords:

identity of migrants, cultural and everyday practices of migrants, integration, assimilation, segregation, multiculturalism

Abstract

The article is devoted to the conceptualization of the sociological construct of adaptation of migrants based on the theory of ethnic stratification and the concept of a two-level dimension of adaptation: the dimension of value orientations and social inclusion, within the framework of an empirical study on the adaptation strategies of modern migrants from Ukraine to Israel. Depending on the level of social inclusion and value orientations of migrants regarding the ethnic affiliation of migrants, which is characteristic of migrants from Ukraine in Israel, five possible adaptation models of migrants were identified: assimilation, value integration, inclusive integration, multiculturalism and segregation, each of which is inherent certain categories of migrants from Ukraine in Israel. The model of assimilation is widespread among religious Jewish migrants. Models of multiculturalism and value integration are widespread among secular Jewish migrants. Models of segregation and inclusive integration are inherent in the category of non-Jewish migrants.

The article is devoted to the conceptualization of the sociological construct of adaptation of migrants based on the theory of ethnic stratification and the concept of a two-level dimension of adaptation: the dimension of value orientations and social inclusion, within the framework of an empirical study on the adaptation strategies of modern migrants from Ukraine to Israel. Depending on the level of social inclusion and value orientations of migrants regarding the ethnic affiliation of migrants, which is characteristic of migrants from Ukraine in Israel, five possible adaptation models of migrants were identified: assimilation, value integration, inclusive integration, multiculturalism and segregation, each of which is inherent certain categories of migrants from Ukraine in Israel. The model of assimilation is widespread among religious Jewish migrants. Models of multiculturalism and value integration are widespread among secular Jewish migrants. Models of segregation and inclusive integration are inherent in the category of non-Jewish migrants.

References

Akulenko, L. et al. (2020). World study of values in Ukraine. Kyiv: Ukrainian Center for European Policy. Retrieved March 11, 2024 from https://ucep.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/WVS_UA_2020_report_WEB.pdf

Central Bureau of Statistics. (2020). Immigration to Israel 2020. Retrieved March 11, 2024 from https://www.cbs.gov.il/en.

Golovakha, E., Dembitskyi, S., Zhulenova, O., & Liubyva, T. (2020). Research methods of adaptation, inclusion and identity change under the conditions of mass migrations: development and testing. Sociology: theory, methods, marketing, 2, 24–41. https://doi.org/10.15407/sociology2020.02.024.

Gordon, M. M. (1964). Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins. New York: Oxford University Press.

Horowitz, T. (2005). The Integration of Immigrants from the Former Soviet Union. Israel Affairs, 11(1), 117–136.

Kushnirovich, N., & Youngmann, R. (2017). Paths to success of Israeli immigrants from different countries of origin. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 60, 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2017.07.002.

Migration processes in the modern world: global, regional and national dimensions: Conceptual apparatus, conceptual approaches, theory and practice. (1998). In Yu. I. Rymarenko (Eds.), Encyclopedia., (р. 912). Kyiv: Dovira.

Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. New York: Routledge. 2nd ed.

Pliushch, V. (2020). Sociological models of sociocultural adaptation of modern migrants in a foreign cultural environment. Actual problems of philosophy and sociology, 27, 103–114. https://doi.org/10.32837/apfs.v0i27.930.

Pliushch, V. (2021). Sociocultural adaptation of migrants: conceptualization, stages and their dynamics. Actual problems of philosophy and sociology, 31, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.32837/apfs.v0i31.1004.

Raijman, R. (2020). A Warm Welcome for Some: Israel Embraces Immigration of Jewish Diaspora, Sharply Restricts Labor Migrants and Asylum Seekers. Brussels: Migration Policy Institute Europe. Retrieved February 12, from https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/israel-law-of-return-asylum-labor-migration.

Rudmin, F. W. (2009). Catalog of Acculturation Constructs: Descriptions of 126 Taxonomies, 1918–2003. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture. Retrieved March 11, 2024 from https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/orpc/vol8/iss1/8/.

Rovenchak, O., & Volodko, V. (2015). International migration: theory and practice. Monograph. Lviv: Ivan Franko Lviv National University.

Ruchka, A. (2020). Dynamics of value priorities of the population of Ukraine over the last three decades (1991–2020). Ukrainian society: Monitoring of social changes, 7(21), 69–78.

Semyonov, M., & Gorodzeisky, A. (2012). Israel: an Immigrant Society. In International Perspectives: Integration and Inclusion. McGill-Queen’s University Press. Queen's Policy Studies, 164, 147–164.

Skokova, L. (2018). Cultural practices in modern society: theoretical approaches and empirical measurements. Monograph. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.

Tancher, V., & Skokova, L. (2009). Cultural sociology: a “strong program” of research into the meanings of social life. Sociology: theory, methods, marketing, 4, 19–42.

Telles, E. E., & Ortiz, V. (2008). Generations of Exclusion: Racial Assimilation and Mexican Americans. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Turner, J. H. (2013). Theoretical Sociology: 1830 to the Present. SAGE.

Yashkina, D. (2021). Solo Living outside Home: Case of Ukrainian Migrants. Sоciological Studios, 2(21), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.29038/2306-3971-2022-02-33-41.

Published

26.06.2024

Issue

Section

SOCIAL REALITY IN EMPIRICAL STUDIES