Genesis of the Scientific Discourse and the Prospects of Mass Social Mobilization Study


  • V. Ya. Vakhula Lviv Ivan Franko National University



mass social mobilization, collective action, structure of political opportunities, social networks in internet as structure of mass mobilization


Scholarly discourse on mass social mobilization is analyzed with specific attention to crossdisciplinary integration of psychology, social psychology, political and historical science heritage with sociological one. The prospects of crossdisciplinary integration in the study of mass social mobilization is elaborated. Specific role of modern telecommunicational technologies, namely social media, in political mass mobilization (especially connected with dysfunctional collective action) is elaborated. The analysis of influencing of social media on forming of modern civil society from point of the indicated paradigms is carried out.


1. Vajnola, R., Kaps’ka, A., Komarova, N. (1999), «Volunteerism in Ukraine: development trends», Kyiv, 112 p.
2. Klimov, I. (2004), «Social mobilization: the history of the concept», Chelovek. Soobshchestvo, No. 1, pp. 6–23.
3. Nazaretjan, A. (2003), «Aggressive crowd, mass panic, rumors», Sankt-Peterburg, 192 p.
4. Reznik, O. (2009), «Membership in public organizations as cooperative practice», Ukrajins’kyj socium, No. 2, Vol. 29, pp. 22–33.
5. Smelzer, N. (1998), «Sociology», Moskwa : Feniks, 688 p.
6. «Sociological Encyclopedic Dictionary» (1998), Red.-koordynator Osipov, H.V., Moskwa, 488 p.
7. Shadrin, A. Yu. (2013), «The mobilization model of development in the USSR (1945–1991 gg.). The crisis and the attempts to overcome it», Istoričeskie iyssledovanija, No. 2, рp. 29–50.
8. Yanickij, O. N. (2012), «Mass mobilization: Theory», Sociolohičeskie issledovanija, No. 6, pp. 3–12.
9. Adorno, T. W. (1950), The authoritarian personality, N.Y., 228 p.
10. Altemeyer, B. (1988), Enemies of freedom: Understanding right wing authoritarianism, San Francisco, 388 p.
11. Amiot, C. E., Bourhis, R. Y. (2005), Ideological beliefs as determinants of discrimination in positive and negative outcome distributions, European Journ. of Social Psychology, Vol. 35, pр. 581–598.
12. Blank, T. (2003), Determinants of national identity in East and West Germany: an empirical comparison of theories on the significance of authoritarianism, anomie, and general self-esteem, Political Psychology, Vol. 24, pp. 259–288.
13. Collier, D., Levitsky, S. (1997), Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research, World Politics, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 430–451.
14. Dahl, R. (1956), A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 287 p.
15. Dambrun, M., Guimond, S., Duarte, S. (2002), The impact of hierarchy-enhancing vs. attenuating academic major on stereotyping: the mediating role of perceives social norm, Current Research in Social Psychology, Vol. 7, Nо. 8, pр. 114–135.
16. Dambrun, M., Diarte, S., Guimond, S. (2004), Why are men more likely to support group-based dominance than women? The mediating role of gender identification, British Journ. of Social Psychology, Vol. 43, pр. 287–297.
17. Duckitt, J. (1989), Authoritarianism and group identification: A new view of an old construct, Political Psychol., Vol. 10, pр. 63–84.
18. Duckitt, J. A., Farre, B. A. (1994), Right-wing authoritarianism and political intolerance among whites in the future majority-rule South Africa, The Journ. of Social Psychology, Vol. 134, pр. 735–741.
19. Feather, N. T. (1998), Reactions to penalties for offenses committed by the police and public citizens: testing a social-cognitive process model of retributive justice, Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 75, pр. 528–544.
20. Gordon, R., Howell, J. E. (1959), Higher education for business, N.Y. : Columbia University Press, 1959, 116 p.
21. Guimond, S. (2000), Group socialization and prejudice: the social transmission of intergroup attitudes and beliefs, European Journ. of Social Psychology, Vol. 30, pp. 335–354.<335::aid-ejsp994>;2-v
22. Huntington, S. P. (1968), Political. Order in Changing Societies, New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 488 p.
23. Tilly, C. (1981), As Sociology Meets History, N.Y. : Academic Press, 488 p.
24. Tilly, C. (1992), European Revolutions, Oxford, Blackwell, 262 p.
25. Thompson, E. P. (1969), Collective Violence in European Perspective, Violence in America, Hugh Graham Tedd Gurr., pp. 4–45.
26. Thompson, E. P. (1971), The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the XVIII Century, Customs in Common: Studies in Traditional Popular Culture, N.Y. : Norton, pр. 185–258.
27. Krauss, S. W. (2002), Romanian authoritarianism 10 years after communism, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 28, pp. 1255–1264.
28. Lippa, R. A., Martin, L. R., Friedman H. S. (2000), Gender-related individual differences and mortality in the term an longitudinal study: is masculinity hazardous to your health?, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 26, pр. 1560–1570.
29. Lipsky, M. (1968), Protest as a Political Resource, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 62, pp. 1144–1168.
30. McFarland, S. G., Ageyev, V. S., Abalakina-Papp, M. A. (1992), Authoritarianism in the former Soviet Union, Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 63, pр. 1004–1010.
31. Meyer, D. S., Lindsey, L. (2007), Assessing the Politics of Protest: Political Science and the Study of Social Movements. Handbook of Social Movements, N.Y. : Springer Press, 193 р.
32. Milbrath, L., Klein, W. (1962), Personality Correlates of Political Participation, Acta Sociologica, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 53–65.
33. Nacos, B. L. (2002), Terrorism and Counterterrorism: Understanding Threats and Responses in the Post 9/11 World (3rd Edition), Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 365 p.
34. Parkin, F. (1968), Middle class radicalism: the social bases of the British Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, Manchester U.P., 207 p.
35. Peterson, B. E., Smirks, K. A., Wentworth, P.A. (1997), Generativity and authoritarianism: implications for personality, political involvement, and parenting, Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 72, pр. 1202–1216.
36. Peterson, B. E., Lane, M. D. (2001), Implications of authoritarianism for young adulthood: longitudinal analysis of college experiences and future goals, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 27, pp. 678–690.
37. Piven, F., Cloward, R. (1977), Poor People’s Movements. Why They Succeed, How They Fail, N.Y., 383 p.
38. Ray, J. J. (1976), Do authoritarians hold authoritarian attitudes?, Hum. Relations, Vol. 29, pр. 307–325.
39. Renshon, S. (1974), Psychological Needs and Political Behavior: A Theory of Personality and Political Efficacy, N.Y. : Free Press, 210 р.
40. Schattschneider, E. E., Holt, R. W. (1960), The semisovereign people: a realist’s view of democracy in America, Political Science, 147 p.
41. von Ijzendoorn, M. H. (1989), Moral judgment, authoritarianism, and ethnocentrism, The Journ. of Social Psychology, Vol. 129, pp. 37–45.