Генеза наукового дискурсу та перспективні напрями дослідження масової соціальної мобілізації
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29038/2306-3971-2014-01-06-17Ключові слова:
масова соціальна мобілізація, структура політичних можливостей, колективна дія, соціальні інтернет-мережі як механізм масової мобілізаціїАнотація
Розглянуто генезу наукового дискурсу щодо масової соціальної мобілізації та проаналізовано передумови теоретико-методологічної інтеграції центральних здобутків низки дисциплін (психології й соціальної психології, політичної та історичної науки) із соціологічними напрацюваннями з досліджуваної проблеми. Обґрунтовано переваги міждисциплінарної інтеграції у вивченні масової мобілізації. Розкрито роль новітніх телекомунікаційних технологій, зокрема соціальних медіа, у політичній масовій мобілізації. Наголошено на відмінностях між мобілізаційним механізмом традиційних медіа та соціальних медіа. Розмежовано функціональні й дисфункціональні аспекти масової політичної мобілізації засобами соціальних медіа.
Посилання
1. Vajnola, R., Kaps’ka, A., Komarova, N. (1999), «Volunteerism in Ukraine: development trends», Kyiv, 112 p.
2. Klimov, I. (2004), «Social mobilization: the history of the concept», Chelovek. Soobshchestvo, No. 1, pp. 6–23.
3. Nazaretjan, A. (2003), «Aggressive crowd, mass panic, rumors», Sankt-Peterburg, 192 p.
4. Reznik, O. (2009), «Membership in public organizations as cooperative practice», Ukrajins’kyj socium, No. 2, Vol. 29, pp. 22–33.
5. Smelzer, N. (1998), «Sociology», Moskwa : Feniks, 688 p.
6. «Sociological Encyclopedic Dictionary» (1998), Red.-koordynator Osipov, H.V., Moskwa, 488 p.
7. Shadrin, A. Yu. (2013), «The mobilization model of development in the USSR (1945–1991 gg.). The crisis and the attempts to overcome it», Istoričeskie iyssledovanija, No. 2, рp. 29–50.
8. Yanickij, O. N. (2012), «Mass mobilization: Theory», Sociolohičeskie issledovanija, No. 6, pp. 3–12.
9. Adorno, T. W. (1950), The authoritarian personality, N.Y., 228 p.
10. Altemeyer, B. (1988), Enemies of freedom: Understanding right wing authoritarianism, San Francisco, 388 p.
11. Amiot, C. E., Bourhis, R. Y. (2005), Ideological beliefs as determinants of discrimination in positive and negative outcome distributions, European Journ. of Social Psychology, Vol. 35, pр. 581–598. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.238.
12. Blank, T. (2003), Determinants of national identity in East and West Germany: an empirical comparison of theories on the significance of authoritarianism, anomie, and general self-esteem, Political Psychology, Vol. 24, pp. 259–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895x.00328.
13. Collier, D., Levitsky, S. (1997), Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research, World Politics, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 430–451. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.1997.0009
14. Dahl, R. (1956), A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 287 p.
15. Dambrun, M., Guimond, S., Duarte, S. (2002), The impact of hierarchy-enhancing vs. attenuating academic major on stereotyping: the mediating role of perceives social norm, Current Research in Social Psychology, Vol. 7, Nо. 8, pр. 114–135.
16. Dambrun, M., Diarte, S., Guimond, S. (2004), Why are men more likely to support group-based dominance than women? The mediating role of gender identification, British Journ. of Social Psychology, Vol. 43, pр. 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1348/0144666041501714
17. Duckitt, J. (1989), Authoritarianism and group identification: A new view of an old construct, Political Psychol., Vol. 10, pр. 63–84. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791588
18. Duckitt, J. A., Farre, B. A. (1994), Right-wing authoritarianism and political intolerance among whites in the future majority-rule South Africa, The Journ. of Social Psychology, Vol. 134, pр. 735–741. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1994.9923008
19. Feather, N. T. (1998), Reactions to penalties for offenses committed by the police and public citizens: testing a social-cognitive process model of retributive justice, Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 75, pр. 528–544. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.75.2.528
20. Gordon, R., Howell, J. E. (1959), Higher education for business, N.Y. : Columbia University Press, 1959, 116 p.
21. Guimond, S. (2000), Group socialization and prejudice: the social transmission of intergroup attitudes and beliefs, European Journ. of Social Psychology, Vol. 30, pp. 335–354. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(200005/06)30:3<335::aid-ejsp994>3.0.co;2-v
22. Huntington, S. P. (1968), Political. Order in Changing Societies, New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 488 p.
23. Tilly, C. (1981), As Sociology Meets History, N.Y. : Academic Press, 488 p.
24. Tilly, C. (1992), European Revolutions, Oxford, Blackwell, 262 p.
25. Thompson, E. P. (1969), Collective Violence in European Perspective, Violence in America, Hugh Graham Tedd Gurr., pp. 4–45.
26. Thompson, E. P. (1971), The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the XVIII Century, Customs in Common: Studies in Traditional Popular Culture, N.Y. : Norton, pр. 185–258.
27. Krauss, S. W. (2002), Romanian authoritarianism 10 years after communism, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 28, pp. 1255–1264. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672022812010
28. Lippa, R. A., Martin, L. R., Friedman H. S. (2000), Gender-related individual differences and mortality in the term an longitudinal study: is masculinity hazardous to your health?, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 26, pр. 1560–1570. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672002612010
29. Lipsky, M. (1968), Protest as a Political Resource, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 62, pp. 1144–1168.
30. McFarland, S. G., Ageyev, V. S., Abalakina-Papp, M. A. (1992), Authoritarianism in the former Soviet Union, Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 63, pр. 1004–1010. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.1004
31. Meyer, D. S., Lindsey, L. (2007), Assessing the Politics of Protest: Political Science and the Study of Social Movements. Handbook of Social Movements, N.Y. : Springer Press, 193 р.
32. Milbrath, L., Klein, W. (1962), Personality Correlates of Political Participation, Acta Sociologica, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169936200600105
33. Nacos, B. L. (2002), Terrorism and Counterterrorism: Understanding Threats and Responses in the Post 9/11 World (3rd Edition), Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 365 p.
34. Parkin, F. (1968), Middle class radicalism: the social bases of the British Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, Manchester U.P., 207 p.
35. Peterson, B. E., Smirks, K. A., Wentworth, P.A. (1997), Generativity and authoritarianism: implications for personality, political involvement, and parenting, Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 72, pр. 1202–1216. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.72.5.1202
36. Peterson, B. E., Lane, M. D. (2001), Implications of authoritarianism for young adulthood: longitudinal analysis of college experiences and future goals, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 27, pp. 678–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201276004
37. Piven, F., Cloward, R. (1977), Poor People’s Movements. Why They Succeed, How They Fail, N.Y., 383 p.
38. Ray, J. J. (1976), Do authoritarians hold authoritarian attitudes?, Hum. Relations, Vol. 29, pр. 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872677602900401
39. Renshon, S. (1974), Psychological Needs and Political Behavior: A Theory of Personality and Political Efficacy, N.Y. : Free Press, 210 р.
40. Schattschneider, E. E., Holt, R. W. (1960), The semisovereign people: a realist’s view of democracy in America, Political Science, 147 p.
41. von Ijzendoorn, M. H. (1989), Moral judgment, authoritarianism, and ethnocentrism, The Journ. of Social Psychology, Vol. 129, pp. 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1989.9711697
2. Klimov, I. (2004), «Social mobilization: the history of the concept», Chelovek. Soobshchestvo, No. 1, pp. 6–23.
3. Nazaretjan, A. (2003), «Aggressive crowd, mass panic, rumors», Sankt-Peterburg, 192 p.
4. Reznik, O. (2009), «Membership in public organizations as cooperative practice», Ukrajins’kyj socium, No. 2, Vol. 29, pp. 22–33.
5. Smelzer, N. (1998), «Sociology», Moskwa : Feniks, 688 p.
6. «Sociological Encyclopedic Dictionary» (1998), Red.-koordynator Osipov, H.V., Moskwa, 488 p.
7. Shadrin, A. Yu. (2013), «The mobilization model of development in the USSR (1945–1991 gg.). The crisis and the attempts to overcome it», Istoričeskie iyssledovanija, No. 2, рp. 29–50.
8. Yanickij, O. N. (2012), «Mass mobilization: Theory», Sociolohičeskie issledovanija, No. 6, pp. 3–12.
9. Adorno, T. W. (1950), The authoritarian personality, N.Y., 228 p.
10. Altemeyer, B. (1988), Enemies of freedom: Understanding right wing authoritarianism, San Francisco, 388 p.
11. Amiot, C. E., Bourhis, R. Y. (2005), Ideological beliefs as determinants of discrimination in positive and negative outcome distributions, European Journ. of Social Psychology, Vol. 35, pр. 581–598. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.238.
12. Blank, T. (2003), Determinants of national identity in East and West Germany: an empirical comparison of theories on the significance of authoritarianism, anomie, and general self-esteem, Political Psychology, Vol. 24, pp. 259–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895x.00328.
13. Collier, D., Levitsky, S. (1997), Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research, World Politics, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 430–451. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.1997.0009
14. Dahl, R. (1956), A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 287 p.
15. Dambrun, M., Guimond, S., Duarte, S. (2002), The impact of hierarchy-enhancing vs. attenuating academic major on stereotyping: the mediating role of perceives social norm, Current Research in Social Psychology, Vol. 7, Nо. 8, pр. 114–135.
16. Dambrun, M., Diarte, S., Guimond, S. (2004), Why are men more likely to support group-based dominance than women? The mediating role of gender identification, British Journ. of Social Psychology, Vol. 43, pр. 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1348/0144666041501714
17. Duckitt, J. (1989), Authoritarianism and group identification: A new view of an old construct, Political Psychol., Vol. 10, pр. 63–84. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791588
18. Duckitt, J. A., Farre, B. A. (1994), Right-wing authoritarianism and political intolerance among whites in the future majority-rule South Africa, The Journ. of Social Psychology, Vol. 134, pр. 735–741. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1994.9923008
19. Feather, N. T. (1998), Reactions to penalties for offenses committed by the police and public citizens: testing a social-cognitive process model of retributive justice, Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 75, pр. 528–544. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.75.2.528
20. Gordon, R., Howell, J. E. (1959), Higher education for business, N.Y. : Columbia University Press, 1959, 116 p.
21. Guimond, S. (2000), Group socialization and prejudice: the social transmission of intergroup attitudes and beliefs, European Journ. of Social Psychology, Vol. 30, pp. 335–354. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(200005/06)30:3<335::aid-ejsp994>3.0.co;2-v
22. Huntington, S. P. (1968), Political. Order in Changing Societies, New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 488 p.
23. Tilly, C. (1981), As Sociology Meets History, N.Y. : Academic Press, 488 p.
24. Tilly, C. (1992), European Revolutions, Oxford, Blackwell, 262 p.
25. Thompson, E. P. (1969), Collective Violence in European Perspective, Violence in America, Hugh Graham Tedd Gurr., pp. 4–45.
26. Thompson, E. P. (1971), The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the XVIII Century, Customs in Common: Studies in Traditional Popular Culture, N.Y. : Norton, pр. 185–258.
27. Krauss, S. W. (2002), Romanian authoritarianism 10 years after communism, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 28, pp. 1255–1264. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672022812010
28. Lippa, R. A., Martin, L. R., Friedman H. S. (2000), Gender-related individual differences and mortality in the term an longitudinal study: is masculinity hazardous to your health?, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 26, pр. 1560–1570. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672002612010
29. Lipsky, M. (1968), Protest as a Political Resource, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 62, pp. 1144–1168.
30. McFarland, S. G., Ageyev, V. S., Abalakina-Papp, M. A. (1992), Authoritarianism in the former Soviet Union, Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 63, pр. 1004–1010. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.1004
31. Meyer, D. S., Lindsey, L. (2007), Assessing the Politics of Protest: Political Science and the Study of Social Movements. Handbook of Social Movements, N.Y. : Springer Press, 193 р.
32. Milbrath, L., Klein, W. (1962), Personality Correlates of Political Participation, Acta Sociologica, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169936200600105
33. Nacos, B. L. (2002), Terrorism and Counterterrorism: Understanding Threats and Responses in the Post 9/11 World (3rd Edition), Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 365 p.
34. Parkin, F. (1968), Middle class radicalism: the social bases of the British Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, Manchester U.P., 207 p.
35. Peterson, B. E., Smirks, K. A., Wentworth, P.A. (1997), Generativity and authoritarianism: implications for personality, political involvement, and parenting, Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 72, pр. 1202–1216. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.72.5.1202
36. Peterson, B. E., Lane, M. D. (2001), Implications of authoritarianism for young adulthood: longitudinal analysis of college experiences and future goals, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 27, pp. 678–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201276004
37. Piven, F., Cloward, R. (1977), Poor People’s Movements. Why They Succeed, How They Fail, N.Y., 383 p.
38. Ray, J. J. (1976), Do authoritarians hold authoritarian attitudes?, Hum. Relations, Vol. 29, pр. 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872677602900401
39. Renshon, S. (1974), Psychological Needs and Political Behavior: A Theory of Personality and Political Efficacy, N.Y. : Free Press, 210 р.
40. Schattschneider, E. E., Holt, R. W. (1960), The semisovereign people: a realist’s view of democracy in America, Political Science, 147 p.
41. von Ijzendoorn, M. H. (1989), Moral judgment, authoritarianism, and ethnocentrism, The Journ. of Social Psychology, Vol. 129, pp. 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1989.9711697
Завантаження
Опубліковано
12.05.2018
Номер
Розділ
СОЦІОЛОГІЯ: АКТУАЛЬНЕ, ДИСКУСІЙНЕ
