Jan van Dijk's Network Society Paradigm: Potential for Theoretical Conceptualization

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2306-3971-2025-01-31-31

Keywords:

network society, Jan van Dijk, information society, digital communication, social transformations, theoretical conceptualization

Abstract

The article presents an analytical review of the network society paradigm developed by Jan van Dijk, aiming to evaluate its potential as a theoretical tool for understanding the social transformations of the digital age. The author reconstructs the main elements of the concept, including a typology of network structures, seven basic laws of network functioning, and mechanisms of influence concentration, clustering, and information selectivity. Van Dijk’s paradigm is interpreted as a multilayered model encompassing micro-, meso-, and macro-level processes. A comparative analysis of the approaches of Manuel Castells and Barry Wellman is provided, using such criteria as level of analysis, conceptual focus, operationalization, and applicability. Special attention is paid to applied research using van Dijk’s framework in the fields of digital inequality, media power, infrastructural dynamics, and online communication. The article argues that the network society paradigm offers significant heuristic value and methodological flexibility, while also requiring further critical refinement and contextual adaptation. Future research directions are suggested, including empirical testing of “network laws,” studies of disinformation flows, artificial intelligence, and platform capitalism. The article contributes to the development of the Ukrainian academic discourse on digital societal transformations.

References

August, V. (2022). Political ideas of the network society: why digitalization research needs critical conceptual analysis. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 32, 313–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41358-021-00305-z

Büchi, M., Just, N., & Latzer, M. (2016). Modeling the second-level digital divide: A five-country study of social differences in Internet use. New Media & Society, 18(11), 2703–2722. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815604154

Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Blackwell.

Castells, M. (1997). Economy, society and culture: Network society and on the power of identity. Blackwell.

Castells, M. (1998). End of Millennium. Blackwell.

Castells, M. (2004). Informationalism, networks, and the network society: a theoretical blueprint. In M. Castells (eds.), The network society: a cross-cultural perspective (pp. 2–45). UK: Edward Elgar Pub. Retrieved April 10, 2025 from http://socium.ge/downloads/komunikaciisteoria/eng/Castells%20Manuel%20The%20Network%20Society.pdf

Castells, M. (2010). The Rise of the Network Society (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The Costs of Connection: How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capitalism. Stanford University Press.

Dencik, L., Hintz, A., Redden, J., & Warne, H. (2016). Data justice: Towards an intersectional politics of data. The Information Society, 32(2), 168–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2016.1140102

Dijk, J. van (1991). De Netwerkmaatschappij: Sociale Aspecten Van Nieuwe Media. Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum.

Dijk, J. van (2006). The Network Society: Social Aspects of New Media (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Dijk, J. van. (2020a). The Digital Divide (1st ed.). Wiley. Retrieved April 10, 2025 from https://www.perlego.com/book/1536601/the-digital-divide-pdf

Dijk, J. van (2020b). The Network Society (4th ed.). Sage Publications. Retrieved April 10, 2025 from https://surl.li/sgzanb

Helsper, E. J., & van Deursen, A. J. A. M. (2017). Do the rich get digitally richer? Quantity and quality of support for digital engagement. Information, Communication & Society, 20(5), 700–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1203454

Livingstone, S., Sefton-Green, J., & Helsper, E. (2021). The Class: Living and Learning in the Digital Age. NYU Press.

Milgram, S. (1967). The small world problem. Psychology Today, 2, 60–67.

Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. NYU Press.

Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. Penguin Books.

Parthasarathy, B. (2019). The Digital Transformation of Governance in India. Springer.

Pirogan, M., Katzenbach, C. (2017). Revisiting Castells’ Network Society. Digital Society Blog . Retrieved April 10, 2025 from https://www.hiig.de/en/revisiting-castells-network-society/

Reisdorf, B. C., & Groselj, D. (2021). Internet (non-)use types and motivational access: Implications for digital inequalities research. New Media & Society, 23(9), 2716–2734. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820942747

Robinson, L., Schulz, J., Cotten, S. R., Hale, T. M., & Williams, A. (2020). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society, 23(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1647223

Taylor, L. (2017). What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally. Big Data & Society, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717736335

van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16(3), 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487959

Wellman, B. (2001). Physical Place and Cyber Place: The Rise of Personalized Networks. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(2), 227–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00309

Published

27.06.2025

Issue

Section

METHODOLOGY AND METHODS OF SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH