Подвійна природа політичних ринків: чи підриває це демократію?
Ключові слова:
політичний процес, політичний ринок, політичний маркетинг, демократіяАнотація
У статті проаналізовано суперечливу природу політичного маркетингу як теорії та технології. Також розглянуто різні аспекти цих суперечностей і різні проблеми, пов’язані із застосуванням політичного маркетингу.
Посилання
1. Shedler, A. (1997), The End of Politics? Explorations into Modern Antipolitics, London ; NY : Macmillan and St. Martin’s Press.
2. Diamond, L., Plattner, M. F. (2001), The Global Divergence of Democracies, Baltimore : Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
3. Newman, B. (1999), The Mass Marketing of Politics: Democracy in an Age of Manufactured Images, Thousand Oaks, CA.
4. Habermas, J. (1989), The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, Cambridge-Massachusetts : The MIT Press.
5. Arato, A., “The concept of civil society: climbing, decay and recreation”, Polis, No. 3, Pp. 48-57.
6. Kertzer, D. (1996), Politics and Symbol, Yale Univ. Press.
7. Marcuse, H.(1992), One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society, Boston : Beacon Press, 257 p.
8. Mills, C. (1956), White collar: The American middle classes, NY : Oxford Univ. Press.
9. Mills, C. (1970), The power elite, NY : Oxford Univ. Press.
10. Bellah, R., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. (1985), Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life, Los Angeles : Univ. of California Press, 355 p.
11. Tocqueville, A. (1969), Democracy in America. Garden City, NY : Anchor Books.
12. Veblen, T. (1965), The theory of the leisure class, NY : A. M. Kelley, 368 p.
13. Bourdieu, P. (1984), Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste, Cambridge, MA : Harvard Univ. Press, 607 p.
14. Schor, J. (1998), The overspent American: The unexpected decline of leisure, NY : Basic Books.
15. Taylor, B. (2000), The personal level. Do Americans shop too much?, Boston : Beacon Press.
16. Habermas, J. (1984), The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Cambridge : Polity, 430 p.
17. Bourdieu, P. (1993), The Field of Cultural Production, NY : Columbia Univ. Press.
18. Maksymov, A. A. (1999), Clean "and" dirty "election technologies, Moscow : Delo, 448 p.
2. Diamond, L., Plattner, M. F. (2001), The Global Divergence of Democracies, Baltimore : Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
3. Newman, B. (1999), The Mass Marketing of Politics: Democracy in an Age of Manufactured Images, Thousand Oaks, CA.
4. Habermas, J. (1989), The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, Cambridge-Massachusetts : The MIT Press.
5. Arato, A., “The concept of civil society: climbing, decay and recreation”, Polis, No. 3, Pp. 48-57.
6. Kertzer, D. (1996), Politics and Symbol, Yale Univ. Press.
7. Marcuse, H.(1992), One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society, Boston : Beacon Press, 257 p.
8. Mills, C. (1956), White collar: The American middle classes, NY : Oxford Univ. Press.
9. Mills, C. (1970), The power elite, NY : Oxford Univ. Press.
10. Bellah, R., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. (1985), Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life, Los Angeles : Univ. of California Press, 355 p.
11. Tocqueville, A. (1969), Democracy in America. Garden City, NY : Anchor Books.
12. Veblen, T. (1965), The theory of the leisure class, NY : A. M. Kelley, 368 p.
13. Bourdieu, P. (1984), Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste, Cambridge, MA : Harvard Univ. Press, 607 p.
14. Schor, J. (1998), The overspent American: The unexpected decline of leisure, NY : Basic Books.
15. Taylor, B. (2000), The personal level. Do Americans shop too much?, Boston : Beacon Press.
16. Habermas, J. (1984), The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Cambridge : Polity, 430 p.
17. Bourdieu, P. (1993), The Field of Cultural Production, NY : Columbia Univ. Press.
18. Maksymov, A. A. (1999), Clean "and" dirty "election technologies, Moscow : Delo, 448 p.
Завантаження
Опубліковано
22.03.2018
Номер
Розділ
Методологія соціологічних досліджень
