Discursive Violence as a Tool of Sociological Legitimation of the Ideological Order of a Divided Society

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2306-3971-2018-01-37-44

Keywords:

divided societies, ideological order, discourse, symbolic violence, legitimation

Abstract

The article discusses the features of the social order of divided societies. The question of the role of sociological discourse in the legitimation of social separation is raised. Attention is focused on the need for self-reflection of the sociological community. The features of the functioning of sociological discourse in a divided society as a tool of legitimation are revealed.

To achieve this goal – to identify the degree of ideological engagement of public sociology discourse - the materials that were published on the official website of the Razumkov Center during 2018 are analyzed. Analytical articles written by experts and analysts in sociological centers, published on official websites are analyzed; comments, interviews, other text and video publications are also considered.

Information published on websites and on behalf of sociological organizations is considered as part of the discourse of public sociology. In this case, non-academic public sociology does not negate the fact that discourse continues to exist as a sociological one and significantly influences the audience.

In the case studies from the sphere of public sociology, discursive violence is observed through the articulation of various schemes of everyday social distinction drawn up in a scheme of scientific distinction. This not only contributes to the legitimization of this picture of the world (by «translating» it into a scientific language, that is, delegating to it the symbolic capital of the field of science), but also legitimizing and hiding the distancing processes associated with it, the extreme form of which can be considered the divides.

References

Althusser, L. (2006). For Marx. Transl. from French. Moscow: Praxis, 392 p.

Berger, P., Lukman, T. (1995). Social construction of reality. Treatise on the sociology of knowledge. Moscow: Medium, 323 p.

Boyko, D. N. (2017). Symbolic violence as an object of sociological research: categorization and operationalization. Visnyk of V. N. KarazinKharkiv National University. Series: Sociological studies of contemporary society: methodology, theory, methods. Issue 37, P. 91–95.

Bourdieu P., Passron J.-C. (2007). Reproduction: elements of the theory of the education system.Transl. from French Moscow. 267 p.

Bourdieu, P. (2005). Sociology of social space.Transl. from French St. Petersburg, Moscow, 288 p.

Dublikash, T., Litovchenko, A., Muradyan, E., Nikulin, V. (2015). Radicalism in the ideologies and practices of supporting integration and disintegration projects in divided societies. Methodology, theory and practice of sociological analysis of modern society, P. 38–45.

Leiphart, A. (1997). Democracy in multicompound societies: A comparative study. Moscow: TheAspectPress, 287 p.

Lefevre, A. (2015). Production space. translation from French Moscow: Strelka Press, 432 p.

Lytovchenko, A., Nekhaienko, O. (2018). Sociologist in a divided society: from diagnostician to propagandist. Advances of science: Proceedings of articles of the international scientific conference. CzechRepublic, KarlovyVary – Ukraine, Kyiv, September 28, P. 1506–1514.

Lytovchenko, А.,Nekhaienko, О. (2016). Critical-Sociological Analysis of the Propaganda Aspects of Sociological Discourse in Ukraine: the Problem’s Designation. SociologicalStudios, 1 (8), P. 16–24. https://doi.org/10.29038/2306-3971-2016-01-16-23

Lytovchenko, А. D. (2012). A Declarative sociological discourse. Altruism, charity and democracy in contemporary social and cultural contexts.The collection of scientific articles on materials of the international scientific conference, P. 113–126.

Тurner, J. (1985), The Structure of Sociological Theory, Transl., ed. by G. V. Оsipov, Мoscow: Progress, 472 p.

Oberschall, A. (2007). Conflict and peace building in divided societies: Responses to ethnic violence. London, 260 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203944851

Published

2018-12-27

Issue

Section

THEORETICAL PROVISIONS OF SOCIOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS