What Determines Trust in Local Governance During the War in Ukraine?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2306-3971-2024-02-43-43

Keywords:

trust, local governance, Ukraine, decentralisation, citizen engagement, transparency, resilience

Abstract

This study explores the factors shaping trust in local governance during wartime in Ukraine, emphasizing the relevance of this topic amid large-scale decentralization reforms and the 2022 full-scale Russian invasion. The research draws on data from the USAID HOVERLA project, analyzing 33,626 survey responses from 86 hromadas across seven oblasts. Survey-weighted linear regression models are employed to examine trust dynamics in local government institutions and starostas (headmen), incorporating socio-demographic factors, satisfaction with services, budget transparency, civic optimism, and citizen participation. The findings highlight the importance of service performance, transparency, and responsiveness in building public trust. Transparent budget management and responsiveness to citizen feedback emerge as critical drivers, mediating the relationship between participation and trust. While trust in local government reflects systemic performance, trust in starostas is influenced by personal engagement and visibility. Socio-demographic differences, such as higher trust among rural residents, older individuals, and women, further shape these dynamics. The study concludes that trust operates through both “consumer” logic-rooted in service satisfaction – and “citizen” logic, emphasizing accountability and fairness. Recommendations include prioritizing resource transparency, ensuring meaningful responses to citizen engagement, and strengthening the role of starostas in rural communities to foster resilience and trust under crisis conditions.

References

Arends, H., Brik, T., Herrmann, B., & Roesel, F. (2023). Decentralization and trust in government: Quasi-experimental evidence from Ukraine. Journal of Comparative Economics, 51(4), 1356–1365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2023.08.002

Baldassare, M. (1985). Trust in local government. Social science quarterly, 66(3), 704.

Chanley, V. A., Rudolph, T. J., & Rahn, W. M. (2000). The origins and consequences of public trust in government: A time series analysis. Public opinion quarterly, 64(3), 239-256.

Gaventa, J., & Barrett, G. (2012). Mapping the Outcomes of Citizen Engagement. World Development, 40(12), 2399–2410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.05.014

Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G. (2010). Transparency of Public Decision-Making: Toward Trust in Local Government? Policy & Internet, 2(1), 5–34.

Hatsko, V. V., & Bezrukova, O. A. (2024). Taking Resilience for Granted: Why it is Important to Measure the Resilience of Ukrainian Communities During the War. Соціальні Технології: Актуальні Проблеми Теорії Та Практики, 104, 91–101. https://doi.org/10.32782/2707-9147.2024.104.7

Hatsko, V., & Darkovich, A. (2024). Resilience by Default? Importance of Measuring the Resilience of Ukrainian Territorial Communities (hromadas) during the War. Retrieved from https://voxukraine.org/en/resilience-by-default-importance-of-measuring-the-resilience-of-ukrainian-territorial-communities-hromadas-during-the-war.

Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2012). E-Participation, Transparency, and Trust in Local Government. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 819–828.

Lee, Y., & Schachter, H. L. (2019). Exploring the Relationship between Trust in Government and Citizen Participation. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(5), 405–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1465956

Van Ryzin, G. G. (2013). Service Quality, Administrative Process, and Citizens’ Evaluation of Local Government in the US. Public Management Review, 17(3), 425–442.

Wang, X., & Van Wart, M. (2007). When Public Participation in Administration Leads to Trust: An Empirical Assessment of Managers’ Perceptions. Public Administration Review, 67(2), 265–278.

Published

30.12.2024

Issue

Section

SOCIAL REALITY IN EMPIRICAL STUDIES