What Determines Trust in Local Governance During the War in Ukraine?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29038/2306-3971-2024-02-43-43Keywords:
trust, local governance, Ukraine, decentralisation, citizen engagement, transparency, resilienceAbstract
This study explores the factors shaping trust in local governance during wartime in Ukraine, emphasizing the relevance of this topic amid large-scale decentralization reforms and the 2022 full-scale Russian invasion. The research draws on data from the USAID HOVERLA project, analyzing 33 626 survey responses from 86 hromadas across seven oblasts. Survey-weighted linear regression models are employed to examine trust dynamics in local government institutions and starostas (headmen), incorporating socio-demographic factors, satisfaction with services, budget transparency, civic optimism, and citizen participation. The findings highlight the importance of service performance, transparency, and responsiveness in building public trust. Transparent budget management and responsiveness to citizen feedback emerge as critical drivers, mediating the relationship between participation and trust. While trust in local government reflects systemic performance, trust in starostas is influenced by personal engagement and visibility. Socio-demographic differences, such as higher trust among rural residents, older individuals, and women, further shape these dynamics. The study concludes that trust operates through both “consumer” logic-rooted in service satisfaction – and “citizen” logic, emphasizing accountability and fairness. Recommendations include prioritizing resource transparency, ensuring meaningful responses to citizen engagement, and strengthening the role of starostas in rural communities to foster resilience and trust under crisis conditions.
References
Aassve, A., Capezzone, T., Cavalli, N., Conzo, P., & Peng, C. (2024). Social and political trust diverge during a crisis. Scientific Reports, 14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50898-4
Ardanaz, M., Otálvaro-Ramírez, S., & Scartascini, C. (2023). Does information about citizen participation initiatives increase political trust? World Development, 162, 106132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106132
Arends, H., Brik, T., Herrmann, B., & Roesel, F. (2023). Decentralization and trust in government: Quasi-experimental evidence from Ukraine. Journal of Comparative Economics, 51(4), 1356–1365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2023.08.002
Baldassare, M. (1985). Trust in local government. Social science quarterly, 66(3), 704.
Beshi, T. D., & Kaur, R. (2020). Public Trust in Local Government: Explaining the Role of Good Governance Practices. Public Organization Review, 20(2), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-019-00444-6
Bøggild, T. (2020). Politicians as Party Hacks: Party Loyalty and Public Distrust in Politicians. The Journal of Politics, 82(4), 1516–1529. https://doi.org/10.1086/708681
Brik, T., & Murtazashvili, J. (2022). The source of Ukraine’s resilience: how decentralized government brought the country together. Foreign Affairs, 28.
Cheema, G. S., & Popovsk, V., (Eds.). (2010). Building Trust in Government: Innovations in Governance Reform in Asia. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
Devine, D. (2024). Does Political Trust Matter? A Meta-analysis on the Consequences of Trust. Political Behavior, 46(4), 2241–2262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-024-09916-y
Frederickson, H. G., & Frederickson, D. G. (1995). Public Perceptions of Ethics in Government. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 537, 163–172.
Gaventa, J., & Barrett, G. (2012). Mapping the Outcomes of Citizen Engagement. World Development, 40(12), 2399–2410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.05.014
Goldfinch, S., Yamamoto, K., & Aoyagi, S. (2023). Does process matter more for predicting trust in government? Participation, performance, and process, in local government in Japan. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89(3), 842–863. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523221099395
Grimes, M. (2017). Procedural fairness and political trust. In S. Zmerli, & T. Meer (eds.), Handbook of Political Trust (pp. 256–269). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G. (2010). Transparency of Public Decision-Making: Toward Trust in Local Government? Policy & Internet, 2(1), 5–34.
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., & Meijer, A. J. (2014). Effects of Transparency on the Perceived Trustworthiness of a Government Organization: Evidence from an Online Experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(1), 137–157. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus048
Gustavsen, A., Pierre, J., & Røiseland, A. (2017). Participation or Satisfaction? Examining Determinants of Trust in Local Government. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 21(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.58235/sjpa.v21i3.11554
Hatsko, V. V., & Bezrukova, O. A. (2024). Taking Resilience for Granted: Why It Is Important to Measure the Resilience of Ukrainian Communities During the War. Social Technologies: Current Issues of Theory and Practice, 104, 91–101. https://doi.org/10.32782/2707-9147.2024.104.7
Hatsko, V., & Darkovich, A. (2024a, January 26). Transparency or Army Aid? What Influences Trust in Local Government in Ukraine? VoxUkraine. Retrieved October 15, 2024 from https://voxukraine.org/en/transparency-or-army-aid-what-influences-trust-in-local-government-in-ukraine
Hatsko, V., & Darkovich, A. (2024b, October 1). Resilience by Default? Importance of Measuring the Resilience of Ukrainian Territorial Communities (hromadas) during the War. VoxUkraine. Retrieved October 15, 2024 from https://voxukraine.org/en/resilience-by-default-importance-of-measuring-the-resilience-of-ukrainian-territorial-communities-hromadas-during-the-war.
Johansson, B., Hopmann, D. N., & Shehata, A. (2021). When the rally-around-the-flag effect disappears, or: when the COVID-19 pandemic becomes “normalized.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 31(sup1), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2021.1924742
Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2012). E-Participation, Transparency, and Trust in Local Government. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 819–828.
Kizilova, K., & Norris, P. (2024). “Rally around the flag” effects in the Russian-Ukrainian war. European Political Science, 23(2), 234–250. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-023-00450-9
Lee, Y., & Schachter, H. L. (2019). Exploring the Relationship between Trust in Government and Citizen Participation. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(5), 405–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1465956
Mok, J. Y., James, O., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2017). Expectations of and Satisfaction with Public Services. In G. G. Van Ryzin, O. James, & S. R. Jilke (Eds.), Experiments in Public Management Research: Challenges and Contributions (pp. 345–360). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316676912.017
Nye, J. S. (1997). In Government We Don’t Trust. Foreign Policy, 108, 99–111. https://doi.org/10.2307/1149092
OECD (2024). OECD Survey on Drivers of Trust in Public Institutions – 2024 Results: Building Trust in a Complex Policy Environment. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9a20554b-en
Rabinovych, M., Brik, T., Darkovich, A., Savisko, M., Hatsko, V., Tytiuk, S., & Piddubnyi, I. (2024). Explaining Ukraine's resilience to Russia's invasion: The role of local governance. Governance, 37(4), 1121-1140.
Reznik, O., & Kozlovskyi, O. (2021). State Institutions of Ukraine in the Mass Consciousness of the Population. Ukrainian Society: Monitoring of Social Changes. 30 Years of Independence, 8(22), 259-279.
Romanova, V. (2022). Ukraine’s resilience to Russia’s military invasion in the context of the decentralisation reform. In Forum Idei. Warsaw: Stefan Batory Foundation.
Siebers, V., Gradus, R., & Grotens, R. (2019). Citizen engagement and trust: A study among citizen panel members in three Dutch municipalities. The Social Science Journal, 56(4), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2018.09.010
Sologoub, I. (2022, February 4). Whom Do We Trust? VoxUkraine. Retrieved October 15, 2024 from https://vox ukraine.org/komu-my-doviryayemo
Stipak, B. (1979). Citizen Satisfaction with Urban Services: Potential Misuse as a Performance Indicator. Public Administration Review, 39(1), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/3110378
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038
Uslaner, E. M., & Brown, M. (2005). Inequality, Trust, and Civic Engagement. American Politics Research, 33(6), 868–894. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X04271903
Van de Walle, S., & Migchelbrink, K. (2022). Institutional quality, corruption, and impartiality: The role of process and outcome for citizen trust in public administration in 173 European regions. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 25(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2020.1719103
Van Ryzin, G. G. (2013). An Experimental Test of the Expectancy-Disconfirmation Theory of Citizen Satisfaction. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(3), 597–614. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21702
Van Ryzin, G. G. (2015). Service Quality, Administrative Process, and Citizens’ Evaluation of Local Government in the US. Public Management Review, 17(3), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841456
Wang, X., & Van Wart, M. (2007). When Public Participation in Administration Leads to Trust: An Empirical Assessment of Managers’ Perceptions. Public Administration Review, 67(2), 265–278.
Zhang, J., Chen, W., Petrovsky, N., & Walker, R. M. (2022). The Expectancy-Disconfirmation Model and Citizen Satisfaction with Public Services: A Meta-analysis and an Agenda for Best Practice. Public Administration Review, 82(1), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13368
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
