Theoretical Approaches of Understanding the Concept of «Trust»
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29038/2306-3971-2014-01-50-62Keywords:
trust, Sociology, Psychology, subject of trust, object of trust, trust functionAbstract
It analyzes the concept of trust in different theoretical approaches of scientists from the spheres of philosophy, psychology and sociology. Actuality caused by the fact that confidence is one of the major social and psychological categories. It is essential to the process of learning and analyzing individual reality. Attention is paid to local researchers who are studying the problem of trust. The displayed etymology and genesis of the concept of «trust», selected components of trust disclosed mentioned subject and object of trust, singled function. Sections deals with the structure of trust and open three axioms legal consciousness, where trust is the basic construct. It emphasizes the interdisciplinary nature of this concept. It is proved that the objective characteristics of such a social phenomenon as trust requires a broader analysis involving theoretical developments in various humanitarian fields.
References
2. Buber, M. (1999), «Two images faith», Moskov : AST, 302 p.
3. Burdie, P. (1993), «Sociology of Politics», Moskov : Socio-Logos, 244 p.
4. Veber, M. (1990), «Selected Works», Moskov : Progress, 804 p.
5. Veber, M. (1996), «Social psychology of the world’s religions. Religion and Society», Moskov : Nauka, pp. 441–468.
6. Vladykina, I. K., Plesovskih, S. N. (2000), «The phenomenon of trust and political advertising», Vestnik Moskovskogo un-ta. Sociologiya i politologiya, No. 1, pp. 141–153.
7. Gabermas, Yu. (2000), «Structural transformations in openness: Research categories civil society», Lviv : Litopys, 318 p.
8. Giddens, E. (1999), «Sociology», Moskov : Editorial, 704 p.
9. Giddens, E. (2005), «Ordered society: Essay on the Theory of structuration», Moskov : Akademicheskij proekt, 111 p.
10. Gorlach, M., Kremen′, B. (2009), «Political science: the science of politics», Kyjiv : Centr uchbovoji lіteratury, 840 p.
11. Dankin, D. (1999), «Confidence = Trust: politological aspect», Moskov : Intel Teh, 237 p.
12. Dvoryanov, A. A. (2006), «Social functions of the trust», Region: ekonomika i sociologiya, No. 4, pp. 130–141.
13. Zabolotna, G. M. (2003), «The phenomenon of trust and its social functions», Vestnik RUDN. Seriya : Sociologiya, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 75–78.
14. Yl′in I. A. (1994), «About essence of justice: Coll. Op. 10 vol.», Moskov : Rus. kniga, Vol. 4, 385 p.
15. Kozhemyakіna, O. (2007), «Transformational aspect of paradigm trust», Transformacіya paradygm myslennya ta koncepcіj znannya pіd vplyvom suchasnyh vyklykіv u zagalnіj, socіalnіj і praktychnіj fіlosofіji : zb. tez dopovіdej konf., Lviv, pp. 129–130.
16. Martynyuk, I. O., Soboleva, N. I. (2001), «Trust as an indicator of moral and psychological state of society», Ukraïns′ke suspil′stvo: desyat rokіv nezalezhnostі (socіologіchnyj monіtoryng ta komentar naukovcіv), Kyjiv : IS NANU, pp. 460–475.
17. Nikolaenko, V. L., Nikolaenko, L. G. (2011), «Sociology of culture: a brief glossary», Kyjiv : YPK HSZU, pp. 138–139, 577 p.
18. Nikonenko, L. V. (2008), «Trust as a social-psychological phenomenon», Problemy polіtichnoji psyhologіji ta jiji rol u stanovlennі gromadyanyna Ukrainskoji derzhavy : zb. nauk. prac. Kyjiv, Vol. 7, pp. 249–257.
19. Pogorіlyj, S. S. (2010), “Trust in government as a category of political control”, Derzhava ta regіony, No. 2, pp. 210–214.
20. «Political Science Encyclopedic Dictionary» (2004), Kyjiv : Geneza, 736 p.
21. Radaev, V. (2003), «Sociology of markets: the formation of a new direction», Moskov : HU VShE, pp. 34–37.
22. Rodzhers, K. (1994), «A look at psychotherapy. Becoming human», Moskov : Progress, pp. 57-69.
23. Safronov, V. S. (1978), «Features of confidential dialogue» : avtoref. dis. ... kand. psihol. nauk, Moskov, 24 p.
24. Seligmen, A. (2002), «The problem of trust», Moskov : Ideya-Press, 200 p.
25. Skripkina, T. P. (2000), «Psyhology of confidence», Moskov : IC «Akademiya», 264 p.
26. Soboleva, N. I. (2002), «Sociology of subjective reality», Kyjiv : IS NANU, 311 p.
27. Shandor, F. (2011), «The legitimization of power, confidence and tolerance as factors of of social being», Osvіta regіonu, No. 4, pp. 225-230, http://social-science.com.ua/article/650
28. Shakurov, R. H. (1990), «Socio-psychological Basics Management: Director and Teaching staff», Moskov : Prosveschenie, 208 p.
29. Shtompka, P. (1996), «Sociology of social change», Moskov : Aspekt-Press, 416 p.
30. Shtompka, P. (2005), «Sociology: analysis of contemporary society», Moskov : Logos, 664 p.
31. Erikson, E. (2000), «Childhood and society», SPb. : ITD «Letnij sad», 416 p.
32. Erikson, E. (1996), «Identity: the Youth and Crisis», Moskov : Progress, 344 p.
33. Deutsch, M. (1958), Trust and suspicion, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 2, pp. 265–279.
34. Giddens, A. (1991), Modernity and self-identity, Stanford: Stanford univ. press, pp. 35–36.
35. Fukuyama, F. (1995), Trust: the Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, N.Y. : Free Press Paperback, 457 р.
36. Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie (2001), Hrsg. Von J. Ritter, K. Gründer, G. Gabrieli, Bd. 11, Darmstadt, 987 p.
37. Luhmann, N. (1979), Trust and Power, N.Y. : John Wiley & Sons, 208 p.
38. Markova, I. (2006), Trust/Risk and Trust/Fear, Trust and Democratic Transition in Post-Communist Europe : Proceedings of the British Academy, N. Y.: British Academy, pp. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197263136.003.0001
39. Seligman, A. (1998), Trust and sociability: on the limits of confidence and role of expectations, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 390-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1998.tb03372.x
40. Simmel, G. (1964), Faithfulness and gratitude. The sociology of Georg Simmel, London; N. Y. : Collier Macmillan Publishers; The Free Press, pp. 379–395.
41. Sztompka, P. (1999), Trust: a sociological theory, Cambridge, 365 p.
42. Yamagishi, T., Cook, K. S. (1993), Generalized Exchange and Social Dilemmas, Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 56, No. 4, pp. 235–248. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786661