Key Theories of Ethnosociology in Highlighting the Ethnogenesis of the Ukrainian People

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2306-3971-2023-01-15-25

Keywords:

ethnosociology, ethnogenesis, social interaction, behavioral strategies

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to study the key scientific paradigms of the ethnogenesis of the Ukrainian people in the context of the development of ethnosociological theories. The article analyzes the problem of the multi-vector nature of scientific approaches to the formation of ethnicity and inter-ethnic interaction. The author has made an attempt to correlate the methodological possibilities of cultural and structural approaches of ethnosociological research in relation to the formation of social prerequisites for the emergence of the Ukrainian political nation. 

The key concepts of ethnogenesis were also described, taking into account possible methodological and ideological variations that determine the social nature of social interaction during the decision-making process of choosing ethnicity. In addition, the article highlights two main conceptual positions of scientists explaining the concepts of «ethnogenesis» and «ethnos»: «primordialism» and «constructivism». «Primordialism» presupposes the real existence of ethnic groups, and also proceeds from the common consanguineous origin of all members of the ethnic group. The concept of «constructivism» (instrumentalism) insists that an ethnos can be constructed, and this is done, as a rule, by the elite. The most modern and at the same time debatable ethno-institutional constructivist approach was also described, in which ethnogenesis is seen as the process of formation of ethnic groups through social ethno-institutions. This becomes particularly relevant in the conditions of active information warfare by the aggressor country against Ukrainian statehood and the historical heritage of the Ukrainian people.

References

Balibar, Е., & Wallerstein, І. (1991). Race, Nation, Class. Ambiguous Identities. London & NY: Verso. Retrieved April 09, 2023 from http://rebels-library.org/files/ambig_ident.pdf

Cohen, А. (1974). Urban Ethnicity. London: Tavistock. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315013299

Dembitskyi, S. (2022). Indicators of national-civil Ukrainian identity. Kyiv International Institute of Sociology (KIIS). Retrieved Aprіl 18, 2023 from https://www.kiis.com.ua/?lang=ukr&cat=reports&id=1131&page=1

Geloso, V., & Rouanet, L. (2023). Ethnogenesis and statelessness. Eur J Law Econ, 55, 377–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-023-09767-8

Gowricharn, R. S. (2022). Geographies of ethnogenesis and diasporas. Geography Compass, 16(12), e12668. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12668

Fontellai, L. G. (2020). The concept of ethnogenesis: the historical dynamism of collective identities. Revista Historia-Debates e Tendencias. 20(1), 19–35.

Evan, W. M. (1997). Identification with the human species: A challenge for the twenty-first century. Human Relations. 50(8), 987-1003. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679705000807

Le Bon, G. (2009). Psychology of Crowds. Sparkling Books.

Marr, N. (1920). The Japhetic Caucasus and the third ethnic element in the creation of Mediterranean culture. Leipzig. Retrieved April 10, 2023 from https://crecleco.seriot.ch/textes/Marr20-33.html

Monitoring: public opinion in Ukraine after 10 months of war (2022). Kyiv International Institute of Sociology (KIIS). Retrieved Aprіl 08, 2023 from https://www.kiis.com.ua/?lang=ukr&cat=reports&id=1175&page=1

Moreno, G. J. C. (2018). Ethnicity in Ancient Egypt: An Introduction to Key Issues. Journal of Egyptian History, 11(1-2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1163/18741665-12340040

Olzak, S. (1983). Contemporary Ethnic Mobilization. Annual Review of Sociology, 9, 355–374. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.09.080183.002035

Park, R. E. (1928). Human Migration and the Marginal Man. American Journal of Sociology, 33(6), 881–893. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/214592

Redfield, R., Linton, R., & Herskovits, M. J. (1936). Memorandum on the Study of Acculturation. American Anthropologist, 38(1), 149-152. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1936.38.1.02a00330

Renan, E. (1990). What is a nation? Nation and Narration. Ed. by Homi K. Bhabha. London: Routledge, 8–22. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203823064

Salnikova, S., Klymenko, O., & Yemelianova, Y. (2021). Features of Consolidation of the Ukrainian Nation in the Conditions of Decentralization. Comprehensible Science. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 315, 329-340. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85799-8_28

Shulga, M. (2000). Marginality as an identity crisis. Sociology: theory, methods, marketing, 3, 166-170. Retrieved April 07, 2023 from http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/89746/14-Shulga.pdf?sequence=1

Smith, E. (1991). National identity. Reno: University of Nevada Press.

Stonequist, E. V. (1937). Marginal person. A Study in Personality and Culture Conflict. NY: Russell & Russell.

Yemelyanova, Yu. (2019). Functions of Ethnic Culture in the Era of “New Regionalism” (social-philosophical analysis). Sociological Studios, 1(14), 6-12. https://doi.org/10.29038/2306-3971-2019-01-06-12

Published

2023-06-28

Issue

Section

THEORETICAL PROVISIONS OF SOCIOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS